CommunityMember Peacock offers the locals NBC live, paramount + offers the local live, Soon Fox will be offering the local live on their streaming services. How they get from the network owners I’m not sure but am sure it’s less than they get from re-trans fees. Of course many people are rediscovering OTA if they can get it. So the local are shooting themselves in teh foot by insisting on high re-trans fees and pricing people to go A) OTA B) streaming services, C) no longer watching locals at all. I’;s getting harder and harder to get anyone under 50 to pay for cable now. The older demographic is dying off more and more each day and once they either die or cut the cord they aren’t coming back. Imagine if the broadcast fee was $20 less and Charter could reduce pricing by $20. They could offer a basic tv package for $20 instead of $40. That might stop the bleeding. I’m 56 I should be the broadcast networks typical viewer now but I haven’t regularly watched broadcast TV in 15 years. And I sure as hell aint going to start now at $120 a month or even $40 for just locals. My son just turned 30 he’s been mostly on his own since he’s 18 and he’s never had cable. He will never pay for cable. He’s not a-typical either.
10 years ago Charter and Comcast has nearly 40 million TV subs( and this was before Charter bought TWC and BH ) Now combined they have 24 mil. Comcast had 22.5 mil in 2014 all by itself. By he end of 2025 Comcast will have lost HALF its TV subs in 11 years. Of course Dish and DirecTV have loss massive subs too. And YouTubeTV, Fubo, Hulu Live etc do not make up for those losses. Just a small fraction. Locals would be wise to change course before it’s too late. Eventually the broadcasters are going to see they don’t even need the locals anymore aside from the stations they own. How are those locals going to survive without affiliation with a major broadcaster? Show re-runs of Sanford and Son?