ZZZZZZZ At the end of the day she lost for one reason only - she was “betting on” the “I was too drunk to consent” defense and all of the evidence was to the contrary - there was security cam footage, cell phone videos, and numerous not-in-the-case witnesses who all said she wasn’t intoxicated and had barely had anything to drink that day. There was enough proof that she consented to and wanted to play the puck bunny role that night, and that was enough to shoot a hole in her whole case - as it made all of her accusations and testimony “suspect” as one lie begot another and the whole trial went from “he said / she said” to “he said / she lied” and that was the end of it. Did she necessarily definitively consent to what she did with all of them? Maybe not - but she dug her hole with her other falsehoods enough that there wasn’t enough credibility left for criminal convictions.
