Rook As you say, maybe. However, developing systems for defense purposes is significantly different from churning out any old defective code aimed at consumer use; there are many regulations, approval processes and specific procedures. These are not people known to put that level of attention to detail, security and quality into their work, nor being open to submitting themselves to review or justifying design choices. You might be able to get away with their approach with consumer products, where you can issue some sort of corporatese “apology” and “fix” the problems later; you can’t do that after people whose very lives depended on your product were killed in the meantime, to say nothing of the uninvolved civilians who may be in the area. It’s an entirely different ballgame from what they have ever experienced; this is akin to paying the developer of Call of Duty to develop real versions of the weapons depicted in their games. It sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.