Kathy_9
I’ll take a go at it.
Metric is more logical because it is all based on 10, and our whole system of numbers is also based on 10.
That’s a Captain Obvious point of course.
But a parallel example would be that decimal currency is much easier to deal with than the old British system of money.
Until 1971, British money was divided up into pounds, shillings and pence.
>One pound was divided into 20 shillings.
>One shilling was divided into 12 pennies.
>One penny was divided into two halfpennies, or four farthings.
>There were therefore 240 pennies in a pound.
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/researchguidance/weightsandmeasures/money.aspx
For further confusion, a crown was a denomination of sterling coinage worth a quarter of one pound (five shillings, or sixty (old) pence).
Obviously very cumbersome.
For MORE confusion—
India (and many other countries) use commas very differently from Canada and the USA.
And India also has their OWN system in common use:
Crore = ten million (or one hundred lakhs).
Lakh = one hundred thousand.
Anyway compared to all this narishkeit (Yiddish for foolishness etc) the Metric system is simple.
Canada is ideally metric with 10 provinces.
The problem with people trying to adapt to metric is that they try to CONVERT everything in their heads.
That’s the wrong approach.
Just DO it, don’t CONVERT.
This is AFAIK the approach that the language companies (eg Rosetta Stone) use.
I wish I knew that in high school when trying to learn Spanish.
Instead of seeing a bowl of ice cream, and converting ICE CREAM —-> HELADO, it is more efficient to see the bowl and DIRECTLY think “HELADO”.
Same with adapting to metric.